What statistical tests are essential in econometrics?
- Home
- Q & A Forum
- What statistical tests are essential in econometrics?
econometrics
Recommended Reads
Data Collection
As the data collection methods have extreme influence over the validity of the research outcomes, it is considered as the crucial aspect of the studies
What statistical tests are essential in econometrics?
1. Introduction
1. Introduction
Econometrics uses mostly statistical techniques for testing economic theories, measuring the size of relationships, and forecasting trends. Some statistical tests are of specific importance in ensuring the integrity of the data and consistency of the model.
This paper describes five key statistical tests (the ADF, Hausman, Breusch-Pagan/White, Durbin-Watson, and Granger causality tests) and outlines their purpose, usage, and real-world examples.
2. Augmented Dickey-Fuller (ADF) Test
The ADF test plays a key role in time series econometrics to check for stationarity that is required for many models (e.g., ARIMA, VAR). Non-stationary data can create spurious regression results.
Purpose:  To test the null hypothesis that there is a unit root in a time series.
Example: If we are analyzing the quarterly GDP data for the UK, and if we suspect that levels of GDP have a trend, we will perform the ADF test. If p-value> 0.05,  we cannot reject the null hypothesis that GDP cannot be discerned (Dickey, D. A., & Fuller, W. A., 1979).
3. Hausman Test
The Hausman test is used to help determine which model to use for evaluation in panel data, fixed effects ( FE) or arbitrary effects (AR).
Purpose: To test whether an observation-specific unique error term is correlated with the regressors.
The null thesis supports the use of shaft, while the volition would support FE ( Hausman, J. A., 1978).
Example:Â When quantifying productivity across firms over time, if unobservable firm characteristics are likely to be correlated with the explanatory variables (ex., R&D spending), the Hausman test can help determine the most appropriate model.Â
Interpretation: A significant test (p < 0.05) implies fixed effects will be a better model.
4. Breusch-Pagan / White Test
These tests determine heteroskedasticity, a violation of the OLS assumptions that affects the standard errors.
Purpose: To determine if the variance of the errors depends on the values of the independent variables.
Example: In a wage equation, it may be that the error variance is increasing with years of education. If we do not correct for this, we cannot rely on the results of our inference.
Implementation: Conduct an auxiliary regression of the square of your residuals on the independent variables. The test statistic will asymptotically follow a chi-square distribution.
Difference:
- Breusch- Pagan assumes a direct form of heteroskedasticity (Breusch, T.S., & Pagan, A. R., 1979).
- White is a more flexible test and includes cross-product terms (White, H., 1980).
Talk to our Core Econometric Techniques Experts Today
5. Durbin-Watson Test
Residual autocorrelation, substantially clear in a time series, is problematic and violates the OLS hypotheses.
Purpose: To test for first-order autocorrelation in the residuals of a regression.
Example: An analyst modeling inflation rates may suspect their residuals are correlated through time. A Durbin-Watson (DW) statistic much lower than 2 indicates positive autocorrelation (Durbin, J., & Watson, G. S., 1951).
Interpretation:
- DW ≈ 2 – No autocorrelation
- DW < 2 – Positive autocorrelation
- DW > 2 – Negative autocorrelation
6. Granger Causality Test
This test facilitates the evaluation of causal relationships in time series data, not in the philosophical sense, but predictive causality (Granger, C. W. J., 1969).
Purpose: To test if past values of one variable help predict the current values of a second variable.
Example: Testing if interest rates change Granger-cause inflation. If the past values of the interest rates help predict inflation, there is an implied causality.
Implementation: The actual implementation is to estimate the VAR models and test for the joint significance of the lagged predictors.
7. Conclusion
Econometrics, after all, is a process of testing the outgrowth of a specified descriptive model. The ADF test is your safeguard against non-stationarity, while the Hausman test targets the structure of panel data. Breusch-Pagan and White tests provide tests for homoscedasticity, the Durbin-Watson test tells you if the errors are autocorrelated, and Granger causality is useful for identifying predictive relationships over the same time frame. Using these tests helps to provide the greatest deal of robustness and credence to your empirical research.
8. References
- Breusch, T. S., & Pagan, A. R. (1979). Econometrica, 47(5), 1287–1294.
- Dickey, D. A., & Fuller, W. A. (1979). Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74(366), 427–431.
- Durbin, J., & Watson, G. S. (1951). Biometrika, 38(1–2), 159–178.
- Granger, C. W. J. (1969). Econometrica, 37(3), 424–438.
- Hausman, J. A. (1978). Econometrica, 46(6), 1251–1271.
- White, H. (1980). Econometrica, 48(4), 817–838.